Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bpo-33987: ttk frame inside search dialog toplevel #22942

Merged
merged 6 commits into from Oct 25, 2020

Conversation

roseman
Copy link
Contributor

@roseman roseman commented Oct 24, 2020

Copy link
Member

@terryjreedy terryjreedy left a comment

The code changes are correct pending a deeper refactoring.
I have made the needed changes to the tests and will push commits that include a blurb.

@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ def test_create_widgets(self):
def test_make_entry(self):
equal = self.assertEqual
self.dialog.row = 0
self.dialog.top = self.root
self.dialog.top = self.dialog.frame = self.root
Copy link
Member

@terryjreedy terryjreedy Oct 25, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The correct fix to make the tests pass after inserting the Frame is self.dialog.frame = Frame(self.root). The new frame isolates all other widgets from the top level, and this isolation is a reason for inserting the frame independent of the appearance change on some systems, and should be part of the test. (Indeed, self.dialog.top does not exist during the tests being modified.)

@terryjreedy
Copy link
Member

terryjreedy commented Oct 25, 2020

This time an Azure Pipelines Ubuntu ttk Combobox timeout

@terryjreedy terryjreedy merged commit 5df6c99 into python:master Oct 25, 2020
2 of 3 checks passed
@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

miss-islington commented Oct 25, 2020

Thanks @roseman for the PR, and @terryjreedy for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.8.
🐍🍒🤖

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

miss-islington commented Oct 25, 2020

Thanks @roseman for the PR, and @terryjreedy for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.9.
🐍🍒🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2020
(cherry picked from commit 5df6c99)

Co-authored-by: Mark Roseman <mark@markroseman.com>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

bedevere-bot commented Oct 25, 2020

GH-22956 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.8 branch.

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2020
(cherry picked from commit 5df6c99)

Co-authored-by: Mark Roseman <mark@markroseman.com>
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

bedevere-bot commented Oct 25, 2020

GH-22957 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.9 branch.

miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2020
(cherry picked from commit 5df6c99)

Co-authored-by: Mark Roseman <mark@markroseman.com>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 25, 2020
(cherry picked from commit 5df6c99)

Co-authored-by: Mark Roseman <mark@markroseman.com>
adorilson pushed a commit to adorilson/cpython that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants