I'm sorry if this already possible, I could not find a way to achieve the presented behaviour.

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
When adding multiple tools of the same type (e.g. multiple Hovertools) it is impossible for the user to distinguish which of the hover tools he is (de-)activating in the toolbar as the tools get a generic name describing the type of t

This is the settings widget on the left sidebar:

As is clearly seen in the GIF, the tooltip flickers on hovering, and it's not possible to click the icon, because the tooltip eats the click. This is similar to zulip/zulip#16438.

Proposed s

semgrep error: invalid language
  --> None:1
1 | Semgrep bug generating manual config An error occurred while invoking the semgrep engine; please help us fix this by creating an issue at https://github.com/returntocorp/semgrep
  | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

add python doc for start method
like create_window method

User story

What did you do?
1.Goto a RTL version of MDN ste. eg: https://developer.mozilla.org/fa/

2.Look at small arrows on side of Web Technologies; Learn web development; Developer Tools

3.Look at cat that shows "Help us build better CSS debugging tools!
Which CSS bugs are the worst?
Take the Survey"

4-Look at location of Arrow of "Sign Up now" button

5-From Refrences and

I'm sorry if I missed this functionality, but CLI version hasn't it for sure (I saw the related code only in generate_code_examples.py). I guess it will be very useful to eliminate copy-paste phase, especially for large models.

Of course, piping is a solution, but not for development in Jupyter Notebook, for example.

Introduction

Background

To ensure Oppia remains available and high-quality for our students, we run end-to-end tests on all PRs to check that the site's functionality hasn't been broken. Recently, these tests have begun failing non-deterministically. This frustrates developers and slows their work by incorrectly indicating that developers’ changes are faulty. The goal of this issue is t

We noticed that we have some common patterns for common conflicts/duplicate resolution in our monorepo across different binaries.
Like

  deploy_jar_rules=jar_rules(rules=[
    Duplicate('^BUILD', Duplicate.SKIP),
    Duplicate('^META-INF/ASL2.0', Duplicate.SKIP),
    Duplicate('^META-INF/INDEX.LIST', Duplicate.SKIP),
    Duplicate('^META-INF/io.netty.versions.properties', Duplicate.SKIP

We need to improve the comments explaining the main ideas / insights of the solution