Docs: Fix CSS for "pull-quotes" and expandable sections#4873
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Two small CSS fixes that I've already pushed to the live site:
c2fdb47: Only the first line (i.e. the title) of the "pull-quote" should be bold, rather than some of the list items being randomly bold.
More details
For example:
Before:
After:
I double-checked that all pull-quotes do indeed have a title, so we don't accidentally highlight the first line of a paragraph. (For ref:
$ grep -r -A 2 '.. pull-quote::' --include="*.rst")dc52876: One of the arrow symbols (▶️ emoji, while the other one (
▶) got converted to the▼) remained a symbol (as intended). I've added some styling to stop Sphinx from converting either of them to emoji.More details
For example:
Before:
After: