Do not ignore possible BOM files #3598
Open
Conversation
Not a good idea to ignore BOMs which are often manually edited to conform to SMTA fabrication partner expectations and may include irreplaceable knowledge (painstakingly referenced part numbers, etc.).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Not a good idea to ignore BOMs which are often manually edited to conform to SMTA fabrication partner expectations and may include irreplaceable knowledge (painstakingly referenced part numbers, etc.). This type of data is exactly what you want in git.
Reasons for making this change:
Personal experience running a robotics firm.
Links to documentation supporting these rule changes:
Refer to any and all SMTA operator data format guidelines. Each one is different.