Fix capitalization of Unix in multiprocessing documentation

[hawkinsw]

Fix capitalization of Unix in multiprocessing documentation

[rahul-kumi]

I was able to verify this change that corrects the deviation from the convention of addressing Unix in the documentation.
The change lgtm.

[hawkinsw]

I was able to verify this change that corrects the deviation from the convention of addressing Unix in the documentation. The change lgtm.

Thank you @rahul-kumi!!

[JelleZijlstra]

Thanks! Would you mind also changing these:

library/os.path.rst:Unlike a unix shell, Python does not do any *automatic* path expansions.
library/test.rst:   Bind a unix socket, raising :exc:`unittest.SkipTest` if

And probably also these:

library/email.compat32-message.rst:      required by the unix mbox format.  For more flexibility, instantiate a
library/email.compat32-message.rst:      required by the unix mbox format.  For more flexibility, instantiate a
library/email.generator.rst:   *mangle_from_* is intended for use when messages are stored in unix mbox
library/email.generator.rst:   *mangle_from_* is intended for use when messages are stored in unix mbox

[hawkinsw]

Thanks! Would you mind also changing these:

library/os.path.rst:Unlike a unix shell, Python does not do any *automatic* path expansions.
library/test.rst:   Bind a unix socket, raising :exc:`unittest.SkipTest` if

And probably also these:

library/email.compat32-message.rst:      required by the unix mbox format.  For more flexibility, instantiate a
library/email.compat32-message.rst:      required by the unix mbox format.  For more flexibility, instantiate a
library/email.generator.rst:   *mangle_from_* is intended for use when messages are stored in unix mbox
library/email.generator.rst:   *mangle_from_* is intended for use when messages are stored in unix mbox

All updated! I have changed the title of the commit to better reflect that the change is a little wider than initially suggested. I also rebased against master to make it smoother! I hope that it helps! Thanks for the review!

Will

[miss-islington]

Thanks @hawkinsw for the PR, and @JelleZijlstra for merging it 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10, 3.11.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

[bedevere-bot]

GH-97711 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch.

[bedevere-bot]

GH-97712 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch.